Cholesterol uptake capacity: a new measure of HDL functionality for coronary risk assessment

A Harada, R Toh, K Murakami… - The Journal of …, 2017 - academic.oup.com
A Harada, R Toh, K Murakami, M Kiriyama, K Yoshikawa, K Miwa, T Kubo, Y Irino, K Mori…
The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 2017academic.oup.com
Background Recent studies have shown that the cholesterol efflux capacity of HDL is a
better predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than HDL cholesterol. However, the
standard procedures used for measuring cholesterol efflux capacity involve radioisotope-
labeled cholesterol and cultured macrophages. Thus, a simpler method to measure HDL
functionality is needed for clinical application. Methods We established a cell-free assay
system to evaluate the capacity of HDL to accept additional cholesterol, which we named …
Background
Recent studies have shown that the cholesterol efflux capacity of HDL is a better predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than HDL cholesterol. However, the standard procedures used for measuring cholesterol efflux capacity involve radioisotope-labeled cholesterol and cultured macrophages. Thus, a simpler method to measure HDL functionality is needed for clinical application.
Methods
We established a cell-free assay system to evaluate the capacity of HDL to accept additional cholesterol, which we named cholesterol “uptake capacity,” using fluorescently labeled cholesterol and an anti-apolipoprotein A1 antibody. We quantified cholesterol uptake capacity of apolipoprotein B (apoB)-depleted serum samples from patients with coronary artery disease who had previously undergone revascularization.
Results
This assay system exhibited high reproducibility (CV <10%) and a short processing time (<6 h). The myeloperoxidase-mediated oxidation of apoB-depleted serum impaired cholesterol uptake capacity. Cholesterol uptake capacity correlated significantly with cholesterol efflux capacity (r  2 = 0.47, n = 30). Furthermore, cholesterol uptake capacity correlated inversely with the requirement for revascularization because of recurrence of coronary lesions in patients with optimal control of LDL cholesterol (P < 0.01, n = 156). A multivariate analysis adjusted for traditional coronary risk factors showed that only cholesterol uptake capacity remained significant (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29–0.80; P = 0.0048).
Conclusions
Cholesterol uptake capacity assay evaluates the functionality of HDL in a sensitive and high-throughput manner without using radioisotope label and cells. This assay system could be used for the assessment of CVD risk in the clinical settings.
Oxford University Press