[HTML][HTML] Diagnostic utility of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Functional Rating Scale—Revised to detect pharyngeal dysphagia in individuals with amyotrophic lateral …

JL Chapin, LT Gray, T Vasilopoulos, A Anderson… - PloS one, 2020 - journals.plos.org
JL Chapin, LT Gray, T Vasilopoulos, A Anderson, L DiBiase, JD York, R Robison, J Wymer
PloS one, 2020journals.plos.org
Objective The ALS Functional Rating Scale–Revised (ALSFRS-R) is the most commonly
utilized instrument to index bulbar function in both clinical and research settings. We
therefore aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale and
swallowing item to detect radiographically confirmed impairments in swallowing safety
(penetration or aspiration) and global pharyngeal swallowing function in individuals with
ALS. Methods Two-hundred and one individuals with ALS completed the ALSFRS-R and the …
Objective
The ALS Functional Rating Scale–Revised (ALSFRS-R) is the most commonly utilized instrument to index bulbar function in both clinical and research settings. We therefore aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale and swallowing item to detect radiographically confirmed impairments in swallowing safety (penetration or aspiration) and global pharyngeal swallowing function in individuals with ALS.
Methods
Two-hundred and one individuals with ALS completed the ALSFRS-R and the gold standard videofluoroscopic swallowing exam (VFSE). Validated outcomes including the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) were assessed in duplicate by independent and blinded raters. Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were performed to assess accuracy of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale and swallowing item to detect radiographically confirmed unsafe swallowing (PAS > 3) and global pharyngeal dysphagia (DIGEST >1).
Results
Although below acceptable screening tool criterion, a score of ≤ 3 on the ALSFRS-R swallowing item optimized classification accuracy to detect global pharyngeal dysphagia (sensitivity: 68%, specificity: 64%, AUC: 0.68) and penetration/aspiration (sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 60%, AUC: 0.72). Depending on score selection, sensitivity and specificity of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale ranged between 34–94%. A score of < 9 optimized classification accuracy to detect global pharyngeal dysphagia (sensitivity: 68%, specificity: 68%, AUC: 0.76) and unsafe swallowing (sensitivity:78%, specificity:62%, AUC: 0.73).
Conclusions
The ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale or swallowing item did not demonstrate adequate diagnostic accuracy to detect radiographically confirmed swallowing impairment. These results suggest the need for alternate screens for dysphagia in ALS.
PLOS